Give Claude or GPT
full control of Procore.
It runs all of Procore by talking to it. Vendors, billing periods, cost codes, done in seconds. Every change still gated, reversible, and logged. One person does the work of four.
connected · 12 projects · read · propose · approve · undo
> reconcile this month's invoices and fix any overages
I'll match every invoice to its commitment, flag what's over its PO, and draft the change orders to cover it.
⏺ procore_read(invoices, commitments)
⎿ 48 invoices · 12 commitments
✶ 3 invoices $47k over PO on 2 commitments; $31k miscoded.
⏺ procore_propose · draft 2 change orders
⎿ Proposal #1 ready · nothing written yet
⏺ procore_propose · recode $31k to the right cost line
⎿ Proposal #2 ready · nothing written yet
Apply both changes?
❯ 1. Yes, apply both 2. Review diff 3. No
⏵⏵ gated · reversible · every change logged
Procore is a slow, massive nightmare to navigate.
Every setup task routes through coordinators you pay full salaries. Days of clicking for work that should take seconds.
- Vendor setup — hundreds of records, entered and deduped by hand.
- Billing periods — stood up one project at a time, every month.
- Compliance docs — chased and audited project by project.
| Cost Code | Description | Orig. Budget | Committed | Invoiced | Variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01-1000 | General Conditions | $420,000 | $398,500 | $310,200 | +21,500 |
| 02-2200 | Site Demolition | $88,000 | $91,200 | $91,200 | −3,200 |
| 03-3000 | Cast-in-Place Concrete | $612,400 | $605,800 | $402,100 | +6,600 |
| 05-5000 | Structural Steel | $980,500 | $1,012,000 | $880,000 | −31,500 |
| 06-1000 | Rough Carpentry | $210,000 | $205,400 | $150,300 | +4,600 |
| 08-8000 | Glass & Glazing | $176,000 | $176,000 | $90,000 | 0 |
| 09-9000 | Finishes | $322,000 | $298,700 | $110,400 | +23,300 |
| 23-0000 | HVAC | $540,000 | $551,200 | $300,000 | −11,200 |
| 26-0000 | Electrical | $498,000 | $489,900 | $250,000 | +8,100 |
> which projects are over budget?
✶ 3: Steel +$31k, HVAC +$11k, Demo +$3k
Now it can. Point your agent at Procore.
SiftBridge wraps Procore's API in a safe MCP. Your agent reads everything, reasons across the whole graph, and once you approve, executes it.
Ask it why a project is over budget
No report to pull, no tabs to dig through. It traces commitments, change orders, and direct costs across the whole project and tells you the cause in seconds.
> why is the Maple St project over budget?
⏺ procore_read · commitments + change orders
⎿ 14 commitments · 3 COs
⏺ procore_read · direct costs
⎿ 212 cost line items
✶ $82k over · 2 COs unbilled, $31k miscoded
Answer questions no Procore screen can
Cross the whole graph in one question. "Which projects are bleeding margin?" "Which subs have expired insurance and an open invoice?" Ranked, instant, every time.
> which projects are bleeding margin?
⏺ procore_read · gross profit × 12 projects
⎿ scanned 12
⏺ procore_read · budget vs actual
⎿ ranked by margin
✶ 3 under water: Cedar −6%, Maple −4%, Birch −2%
Reconcile the month, catch the overages
Match every invoice to its commitment, flag what's over its PO, and propose the change orders to cover it. The agent does the matching; you approve the fix.
> reconcile June invoices against commitments
⏺ procore_read · invoices + commitments
⎿ 48 invoices · 12 commitments
⏺ procore_propose · draft COs for 3 overages
⎿ Proposal ready
awaiting approval · nothing written yet
Build the report that ate your afternoon
WIP, gross-profit, RFI status, pulled live from the whole company and assembled on demand. A project manager's day of spreadsheets, returned while you read this.
> build me a WIP report
⏺ procore_read · contracts, costs, billings
⎿ 12 projects
⏺ procore_read · % complete + earned value
⎿ computed
✶ WIP ready · $2.4M earned, $180k over/under
Already done. On a real company's live Procore.
Fixed a malformed project number live. A trailing space had silently broken the QBD join for months. Found, fixed, approved, with one-click undo standing by.
Crawled the whole company and surfaced 50 duplicate vendor records, the mess that quietly mis-routes money. That is "clean up all your vendors," executed.
Built WIP, RFI, and gross-profit reports on demand from live data. A project manager's day of spreadsheets, returned in seconds.
Reconciled processed invoices against Procore commitments and direct costs, building the alignment matrix automatically.
Read the entire project-to-commitment-to-vendor graph in seconds, scoped to one company.
Too powerful to hand over without a gate.
Reading and proposing never touch Procore. Approving is the only write. Destructive changes wait for sign-off from someone above the worker driving the agent. Every change carries a one-click undo, built from a snapshot taken before the write, and the warning "this cannot be undone" shows before you approve, not after. Every proposal, execution, and undo lands in a full audit log. That is why you hand this to a team instead of trusting it to one person, and why you pick SiftBridge over a raw passthrough.
"AI slop"? Watch it run your Procore.
The crowd says AI is fine in theory but only makes slop. Then they watch a frontier model crawl an entire Procore and find the money. You don't build the agent. You give the best one safe access.
What they expect
generic · vague · touched nothing
What actually happens
⏺ procore_read · commitments + change orders
⎿ 14 commitments · 3 COs
⏺ procore_read · direct costs
⎿ 212 cost line items
✶ $82k over · 2 COs unbilled, $31k miscoded
⏺ procore_propose · 2 COs + recode $31k
⎿ awaiting your approval
One Claude seat does the work of four coordinators.
Read and propose. The agent crawls your whole Procore and shows exactly what it would clean up. Nothing gets touched.
No execution. Feel the power at zero risk.
Get early access$149 each additional
Full safe write. Propose, approve, execute, undo, audit. The agent does the work; the gate makes it safe to hand a team.
A fraction of the salary it replaces.
Get early accessMultiple companies, SSO, role-based approval chains, white-glove setup.
For multi-company governance.
Talk to usPay annually, get two months free.
Questions, straight answers.
Does it touch my Procore without asking? +
No. Reading and proposing never write anything. The agent builds a pending change and waits. Procore stays untouched until you approve that specific change. Approving is the only action that writes.
What if I fire someone who has access? +
Their seat drives the agent but cannot push anything live alone. Destructive changes need sign-off from someone above them. Cut their access and nothing they proposed can execute on its own.
Can changes be undone? +
Yes. Before any write, we snapshot the current state and build the undo from it. One click rolls it back. When something genuinely cannot be reversed, you see that warning before you approve, never after.
Do I need to be technical? +
No. You connect Procore, generate an access key, and paste one line into your agent. From then on you talk to it in plain language and approve the changes you want. Setting up team approvals is a guided step with help on hand.
Which agents work? +
The best ones. Claude Code, Codex, and Claude Desktop all connect. You bring your own model, so the intelligence keeps improving every month while you own the safe tool surface.
Get on the list. Be first to unleash it.
We're onboarding owners now while we open multi-company access. Join the waitlist and you're first in line to point your agent at Procore.
Waitlist signup. Backend wiring in progress.